According to the Great Man Theory, what fundamentally distinguishes leaders from followers?

The Great Man Theory posits that leadership qualities are inherent and that certain individuals possess unique traits that set them apart from others, thereby enabling them to lead effectively. This theory suggests that the fundamental distinction between leaders and followers lies in the inherent characteristics or traits that leaders possess. These traits may include charisma, intelligence, confidence, decisiveness, and other qualities that are believed to be natural rather than learned or developed over time.

This perspective aligns with the idea that leaders are born rather than made, emphasizing the belief that certain individuals are naturally equipped to rise to leadership roles due to their distinctive characteristics. By framing leadership in this way, the Great Man Theory underscores the notion that followers may not possess the same level of these innate traits, hence their positioning in a supportive or subordinate role.

Other options, such as experience in management, education level, or financial resources, may play roles in the effectiveness of a leader but do not encapsulate the fundamental difference as proposed by the Great Man Theory. Instead, the theory focuses primarily on the unique traits and characteristics of leaders themselves.